W. House Molded EPA's 9/11 Reports
The Environmental Protection Agency's internal watchdog says White House officials pressured the agency to prematurely assure the public that the air was safe to breathe a week after the World Trade Center collapse.
"Competing considerations, such as national security concerns and the desire to reopen Wall Street, also played a role in EPA's air quality statements," the report said.
[...]
The agency's initial statements in the days following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks were not supported by proper air quality monitoring data and analysis, EPA's inspector general, Nikki L. Tinsley, says in a 155-page report released late Thursday.
An email sent just one day after the attacks, from then-EPA Deputy Administrator Linda Fisher's chief of staff to senior EPA officials, said "all statements to the media should be cleared" first by the National Security Council, the report says.
Approval from the NSC, which is chaired by President Bush and serves as his main forum for discussing national security and foreign policy matters with his senior aides and Cabinet, was arranged through an official with the White House Council on Environmental Quality, the report said.
That council, which coordinates federal environmental efforts, in turn "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones," the inspector general found.
After having worked in exile at our West Village offices, we returned to work at our downtown offices. I don’t remember the date clearly but it was towards the end of September 2001. Some of us were excited to be back to work, some weren’t. Just being to close to ground zero was spooky they said. But overall, everyone was excited to be back to work. “They won’t stop us” I think we all thought.
The EPA & the government said it was safe to return and the company said that they had cleaned up our offices. We all thought it was be safe to return. And now this report….
For weeks following our return to the Downtown office we could smell stuff. It smelt like burnt rubber mixed in with dust and dirt. Our building is pretty old and the windows aren’t insulated at all. Which explains how the smells got in. Looking back, I wonder how much of the WTC dirt, debris and asbestos got into our office building being that we are on the block right next to the WTC site. I also know for a fact that to clean up our offices they just called in the cleaning crew one night and had them vacuum the whole place. According to some reports that I’ve read, conventional vacuum cleaners are useless when it comes to fine asbestos particles.
So now we know that we were working in a potentially asbestos contaminated environment. And it’s not just the air inside the office buildings that matters. We had to go out every single day for lunch, which meant more exposure to potentially dangerous pollutants. And it’s not just office workers that are concerned. Downtown is home to many families, there are schools here, day care centers, and lets not forget all the people that worked at ground zero, many of whom didn’t have adequate protection.
So what do we have to look forward to? Potentially, all the above mentioned people could develop asbestos related illnesses in the future. More class action lawsuits against the state and federal governments?
Towards the end, the article states how the EPA changed certain sections of the EPA new release.The Times' account of the report says that the title for the original version of one news release was, "EPA Initiating Emergency Response Activities, Testing Terrorized Sites For Environmental Hazards."
In the final version, the second clause was changed to read, "Reassures Public About Environmental Hazards."
In the same release, a section that said, "Even at low levels, EPA considers asbestos hazardous in this situation" was deleted and replaced with a section that read, in part, "Short-term, low-level exposure of the type that might have been produced by the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings is unlikely to cause significant health effects."
